"Impeachment is so rare that the term is often misunderstood. A typical misconception is to confuse it with involuntary removal from office; in fact, it is only the legal statement of charges, paralleling an indictment in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment. Most constitutions require a supermajority to convict." (1)

It is an extraordinary subversion of the [US] Constitution to send people to die...on the basis of a lie. - Elizabeth Holtzman, Rep., NY
What are we doing? How have we gotten to this point? Anyone older than 23 can remember what it was like 10 years ago... Do you remember when the world was worried about healthcare? And social security? And the worst thing that had happened in our lives was the deaths of 12 students in a town in Colorado?
September 11th, 2001. Two-thousand nine-hundred and seventy-four successful, hard-working Americans die. New Yorkers. College graduates. Fire-fighters. Police officers. Why?
Why do you think? Read that question again, but don't read it as though it were rhetorical. Why do you think those people died? Honestly. Don't go on until you've at least given the question some thought. How long has it been since you asked yourself why it happened?
Let me show you couple things. First of all, a clip from David Cross. Some of this is Ron Paul and Rudy Giuliani. I don't support either of them per se, but I love what David Cross has to say about it. It's amazing how much more honest comedy is than anything else. Watch this to the end:
Are we a nation of 6-year-olds??
The Impeachment Process: A case study: William Jefferson Clinton:
Step I: When independent counsel Kenneth Starr delivered an 11-count report to Congress in September, the House referred it to the Judiciary Committee. The committee's chief investigative counsel, David Schippers, repackaged the allegations into 15 counts , ranging from obstruction of justice in the Monica Lewinsky affair to witness tampering. He dropped Starr's abuse-of-power allegation, however these allegations were resurfaced by committee chairman Henry Hyde of Illinois. On October 5; by a 21-16 vote (following party lines) the committee recommended the full House approve a formal investigation.
Step II: On Oct. 8, by a vote of 258-176, representatives endorsed a somewhat open-ended inquiry by the Judiciary Committee. A Democratic plan that would have limited the inquiry was defeated. In the final vote, 31 Democrats broke ranks and voted with the Republican majority.
Step III: The House Judiciary Committee, after hearing about six weeks of testimony, drafted four articles of impeachment all involving the Lewinsky affair. Two of these articles were allegations of purgery, one for obstruction of justice, the other involving abuse of power. The committee voted 21-16, 23-14, 21-16, 20-17 in favor of all four articles of impeachment to be sent to the House for an Impeachment vote.
Step IV: On December 19 the Full House voted to impeach William Jefferson Clinton on one count of purgery and one count of obstruction of justice. On the previous day the Republican majority of the House rejected a Democratic plan for censure of the President because of the failure of the President to admit he had lied under oath. Later Henry Hyde was heard to say that censure was "unconstitutional"
Step V: The second impeachment trial for a president in US history started on January 11, 1999. Despite heavy pressure from White House counsel and the American public, The Senate defeated a measure to dismiss all charges against the president. The debate as to call witnesses would be called or not was answered when it was announced that the Senate would depose three witnesses: Monica Lewinsky, Vernon Jordan and Sidney Blumenthal. On February 12 the Senate voted 55-45 and 50-50 on the two articles of impeachment preventing Clinton from being removed from office. (2)
So. We obviously know how to do it. Now, let's take a look at the evidence. What has this administration done to deserve an impeachment of all members? This part is easy, kids, even if you're not a conspiracy theorist like me ;) Here we go:
I, Vincent Genovesi, indict the following individuals: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Condoleeza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Colin Powell, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, Donald Rumsfeld and John Ashcroft.
1. Taken from here: First these officials conspired to start an unlawful war of aggression, justified by lies. Then they carried out their illegal conspiracy. It included unlawful killing of thousands of Iraqi civilians, destruction of civilian infrastructure, and use of weapons of mass destruction like cluster bombs and depleted uranium against the civilian population of Iraq. Throughout this conspiracy, they have implemented policies and practices for unlawful arrests, detention, interrogation, beatings, abuse, humiliation and torture, in violation of fundamental human rights protected by law. As a result of their misconduct, the dangers of international terrorism have been severely inflamed, international friends and allies turned away, and the security of our people imperiled. The true aims of the administration are revealed in its legally required policy statement to Congress of September 20, 2002, when it stated that the awful crimes against humanity of September 11, 2001 in New York and Washington, DC "opened vast, new opportunities." (The National Security Strategy of the United States," Section VIII, Development Agendas for Cooperative Action with the Other Main Centers of Global Power) In seizing these "opportunities" to enrich their corporate supporters and increase their own power through aggression, the top officials of this administration have committed "high crimes and misdemeanors" that justify their removal from office and their criminal punishment under law.
It's worse than that.
I very firmly believe that:
2. That our government, at the very best, knew about the attack on September 11th, 2001 well in advance and chose to do nothing or, at worst, had some hand in those events or, at very worst, they orchestrated the entire thing.
I have to show you a few things.

Exhibit 1:
1999: BUSH PLANS WAR IN '99, WELL BEFORE ELECTION
http://www.gnn.tv/articles/article.php?id=761
Exhibit 2:
9/2000: Bush plans Iraq 'regime change' before becoming President
http://www.sundayherald.com/27735
Exhibit 3:
1/2001: Bush plans Iraq invasion before 9/11
http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/10/oneill.bush/
Exhibit 4:
3/2001: Cheney Task Force Eyes Iraq Oil
http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/072003C.shtml
Exhibit 5:
9/12/2001: Rumsfeld considers Iraq bombings one day after terror attacks
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/03/20/national0310EST0431.DTL
Exhibit 6:
12/2001: Bush Begins to Plan Iraq War Three Months After 9/11
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17347-2004Apr16.html
Exhibit 7:
2002-2003: Cheney Pressures CIA on Iraq
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&contentId=A15019-2003Jun4¬Found =true
Exhibit 8:
Spring/2002: A high-ranking military officer reveals how Defense Department extremists suppressed information and twisted the truth to drive the country to war.
http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2004/03/10/osp/index_np.html
Exhibit 9:
4/7/2002: The Crawford Deal: Blair signs up for war at Bush's Texas ranch in April 2002
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8165.htm
Exhibit 10:
5/9/2002: U.S. war hawks oust Bustani from UN because he was attempting to get Iraq to allow chemical weapons inspectors in the country, which would have deprived Washington of a quasi-legal justification for military action against Baghdad.
http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/26/14/feature1.shtml
Exhibt 11:
5/20/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE AIRCRAFT DETECTION SITE IN IRAQ
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020520-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 12:
5/22/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE TWO IRAQI ANTI-AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020522-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 13:
5/24/2002: COALITION AIRCRAFT STRIKE INTEGRATED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020524-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 14:
5/30/2002: COALITION AIRCRAFT STRIKE INTEGRATED AIR DEFENSE SYSTEM
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020530-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 15:
6/14/2002: COALITION STRIKES IRAQI OFFENSIVE AIR SITE
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020614-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 16:
6/20/2002: COALITION STRIKES IRAQI OFFENSIVE MILITARY AIR DEFENSE SITE
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020620-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 17:
6/28/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE AIR-DEFENSE FACILITIES
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020628-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 18:
7/2002 President Bush diverts $700 million into Iraq invasion planning without informing Congress.
http://www.americanprogress.org/site/pp.asp?c=biJRJ8OVF&b=46962
Exhibit 19:
7/13/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE AIR-DEFENSE FACILITIES
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020713-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 20:
7/15/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE MOBILE RADAR UNIT
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020715-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 21:
7/18/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020718-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 22:
7/23/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI COMMUNICATION FACILITIES
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020723-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 23:
7/23/2002: Downing Street Minutes
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1593607,00.html
Exhibit 24:
7/28/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI COMMUNICATION BUNKER
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020728-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 25:
8/5/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI AIR DEFENSE COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020805-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 26:
8/14/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI AIR DEFENSE SYSTEMS
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020814-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 27:
8/15/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE SITE
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020830-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 28:
8/17/2002: Coalition Air Forces Strike Iraqi Mobile Radar Unit August 17
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020817-usia01.htm
Exhibit 29:
8/20/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI MILITARY COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020820-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 30:
8/25/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE AIR DEFENSE RADAR SYSTEMS
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/mil-020825-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 31:
8/27/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE IRAQI MILITARY COMMAND AND CONTROL FACILITY
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020827-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 32:
8/29/2002: COALITION FORCES STRIKE MILITARY RADAR SYSTEM
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020829-centcom01.htm
Exhibit 33:
8/29/2002: Boucher Says Regime Change Is Only Way to Solve Iraq Problem
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/iraq/2002/iraq-020829-usia02.htm
Exhibit 34:
9/2002: White House Silences Experts Who Question Iraq Intel Six Months Before War
http://www.antiwar.com/orig/leopold6.html
Exhibit 35:
9/27/2002: Bush calls Saddam 'the guy who tried to kill my dad'
http://archives.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/09/27/bush.war.talk/
Exhibit 36:
10/2002: White House kills Pentagon plans to strike Zarqawi's camp in Northern Iraq in order to maintain the White House's claim that Iraq has ties to terrorists
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4431601
Exhibit 37:
10/2002: National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq WMD stripped of dissenting opinions *
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/special_packages/iraq/7917626.htm
Exhibit 38:
*1/2003: Britain, U.S. spy on UN allies over war vote
http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=5526&fcategory_desc=Under+Reported
Exhibit 39:
1/2003: 'We're Going to Have to Go to War,' Bush Says to Rice
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19691-2004Apr17.html
Exhibit 40:
1/6/2003: It is revealed that special forces have been operating on missions inside Iraq since August of 2002
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/01/05/1041566310159.html..true
Exhibit 41:
Spring/2003: Blix suspects U.S. spying on him
http://politics.guardian.co.uk/iraq/story/0,12956,1158353,00.html
Exhibit 42:
3/17/2003: Ex-CIA Accuse Bush of Manipulating Iraq Evidence
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,81148,00.html
Exhibit 43:
9/2004: President Bush has Saddam's Pistol
Links borrowed from: Mothers'>http://www.mothersagainstthedraft.org/forum/showthread.php?t=352">Mothers Against the Draft
So. Really, what does a person have to do to get impeached in this country? Cheat on his wife and lie about it, or be responsible for more deaths than Osama Bin Laden, based on a lie?? Unbelieveable, isn't it? Just ten years ago our president lied to this country about whether or not he put a cigar in some stupid cunt and was impeached for it...
Today 3,806 men and women all over the world (3,528 U.S., 151 U.K., 127 Other; Source) have died. Approximately, (given that I haven't any idea how many brave soldiers died this morning as I've written this) that is 832 more people than died on September 11th. This administration is repsonsible for more casualties than the "evil-doers". Based on a lie. Think about that.
I'm not that smart a guy, so I'd like to present a challenge to those college-educated folks out there: It only took one person, Ken Starr, to kick off the impeachment process last time and he did it with a well-researched document submitted to the powers-that-be. It shouldn't take more than that this time. We just need one intelligent, charismatic and inspirational person to kick this mother off and give these good-ole-boys, the skull-'n-crossbones-boys-club fucks the justice they deserve! It's up to you, kids.
Two more videos. These are truly shocking, one long, one short, but both are well worth watching.
George W Bush, ten years ago. They say he's going senile:
Loose Change. Find out the truth about 9/11. Take this one with a grain of salt, but realize that a lot of these facts are true and we aren't being told everything right now:
This was written and/or researched and/or quoted entirely by me. I have a lot more information than this if you're interested. Seriously, this doesn't even begin to scratch the surface. You have no idea how deep this goes. What is going on right now is so frightening it's not even funny. Did you know that our president just gave himself total dictatorship in the event of a "major catastrophe"? Without the approval of Congress and without media coverage? And that this act doesn't describe, in detail, what a "major catastrophe" is? Did you also know that we just built 800 brand new "emergency compounds" all over the country? During WWII, FDR was allowed a third term of presidency. Hitler staged street riots and told the German people, falsely, that there was a constant threat of attack inside of Germany from outside forces that actually posed no threat. Sadly, I doubt that anyone will read this far. We've been duped. More than duped. Hypnotized.
Lullaby, and goodnight, go to sleep sweet America
When you wake up, you'll be fucked up
Watch the news and go to sleep...
Love,
Vinny